🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where Black people are remunerated to address white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The period has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to scrub Black history and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that face all if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.